Former Naughty Dog Dev: Microtransactions are Okay if the Content is Good Enough

18th November, 0 replies

Former Naughty Dog developer Eric Monacelli has spoken with MCVUK about the use of microtransactions in video games.

"Microtransactions tend to get a sort of negative connotation in the games industry," he said. "If you remember back in the day, people bristled when they sold horse armour [for The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion]. It's something that has always happened."

"But if it's good enough content and you want to pay for it, why not pay for it? That's what it comes down to."

Monacelli went on to talk about the use of microtransactions in The Last of Us' multiplayer mode.

"A lot of times I'll hear people say: 'That's just something they cut from the game so you can pay for it.' No, often it's not," he stated.

"A clear-cut example of that is the burst rifle in The Last of Us. A lot of people thought 'Why are they charging for guns?' We did the research and noticed that a lot of players were having trouble jumping into the game for the first time, so we wanted to give people a weapon that was easily accessible and would give them a bit of a leg-up. There were other weapons if they were a more experienced player that they could buy – it's up to them. If you're already kicking ass, you probably don't need these, but if you want 'em, have 'em. It's just a matter of personal preference."

"There are hot debates around this all the time in the office, because everybody's got their own opinion. For me, the more thought that's put into DLC, the more you should be able to charge for it, because it's one of those things where you're creating another game unto itself – The Last of Us: Left Behind was another game. It's essentially the second Last of Us game, right?"

"It's work, and you should pay for good work."

Source:

goo.gl/…

Around the Network

0 COMMENTS
Reply

Related Brainwaves

Trending Articles